Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
John Bell v. United States of America
as 21-1474
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN E. BELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bell et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as NYN/5:18-cv-00466
Plaintiff:
John J. Bell and Debra Bell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
In Re: John Bell
as 16-3918
Petitioner:
John B. Bell
Respondent:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, AKA Chase Manhattan Bank, New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, New York State Board of Law Examiners, Appellate Division , First Deparment and others
BELL V US
as 10-5115
Plaintiff-Appellant:
John James Bell (also known as Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit), John James Bell (also known as Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit), John James Bell (also known as Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit) and others
US v. John Bell, Jr.
as 10-6656
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD BELL, JR., a/k/a Goochie
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
