Cases 1 - 10 of 23
John Roger Jordan, Jr. v. Kathleen Oleary et al
as 2:2021mc01009
Plaintiff:
John Roger Jordan, Jr.
Defendant:
Kathleen Oleary doing business as Fiduciary Trustee, Thomas M. Goethals doing business as Fiduciary Trustee and Raymond J. Ikola doing business as Fiduciary Trustee
John Roger Jordan, Jr. v. United States, et al
as 2:2018mc00159
Defendant:
United States and State of California Federal Corporations
Plaintiff:
John Roger Jordan, Jr.
John Roger Jordan Jr. v. United States and State of California Federal Corporation
as 2:2017mc00115
Plaintiff:
John Roger Jordan, Jr.
Defendant:
United States and State of California Federal Corporation
John Roger Jordan Jr. v. United States and State of California Federal Corporations
as 2:2017cv05049
Plaintiff:
John Roger Jordan, Jr
Defendant:
United States and State of California Federal Corporations
Onley v. Jordan et al
as 2:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
Joseph B Onley
Defendant:
John J Jordan , Richard Larson , Daniel L Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Campbell Company LLC v. Heirs or Assigns of Kauihawale, et al.
as 1:2015cv00133
Defendant:
Heirs or Assigns of Kauihawale, Heirs or Assigns of F.L. Leslie, Sam Leslie and others
Plaintiff:
James Campbell Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Jordan v. Borris et al
as 8:2014cv01308
Respondent:
Thomas J Borris and State of California
Petitioner:
John Roger Jordan, Jr.
John Roger Jordan, Jr. v. Borris et al
as 8:2014cv01304
Respondent:
Thomas J Borris and State of California
Petitioner:
John Roger Jordan, Jr.
John Roger Jordan Jr. v. United States District Court et al
as 2:2014cv05489
Defendant:
Thomas J. Borris, Gregg L. Pricke, II, United States District Court and others
Plaintiff:
John Roger Jordan, Jr.
Jordan v. Borris
as 2:2014cv01394
Plaintiff:
John Roger Jordan, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas J. Borris and Greg L Pricket
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
