Cases 1 - 10 of 24
ROBERTS v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2022cv04829
Plaintiff:
JARVIS ROBERTS
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF BERKS, CITY OF READING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHAFFER'S AUTOMOTIVE, LLC et al v. CAERNARVON TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2022cv03353
Plaintiff:
SCHAFFER'S AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, WILLIAM SCHAFFER, RONALD SCHAFFER and others
Defendant:
CAERNARVON TOWNSHIP, SANDRA STYER, PAUL WHITEMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VASQUEZ v. BERKS COUNTY et al
as 5:2020cv05116
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, JEFFREY SMITH, CHRISTIAN LEINBACH and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SMITH et al v. POLLACK et al
as 5:2019cv05343
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, BERKS COUNTY, JAMES A. POLLACK and others
Plaintiff:
KALEY E. DAMORE, VINCENT J. SMITH and BAIL SHOP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. BERKS COUNTY, PA (TOWNSHIP) et al
as 5:2019cv01342
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC., WEST READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, FOX NEWS MEDIA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANDRON v. SMITH et al
as 5:2017cv04096
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LANDRON
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, JOHN E. WETZEL, JOHN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RANDALL v. FACEBOOK, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv01526
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC., WEST READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, FOX NEW & ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GANNAWAY v. GLUNT et al
as 5:2015cv04241
Petitioner:
SHAKUR C. GANNAWAY
Respondent:
STEVEN GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY, READING, JOHN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00708
Plaintiff:
John Adams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
