Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ohle et al v. Napoleon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01949
Plaintiff: John B Ohle, III, John Wagner and Kensington Capital Advisors, LLC
Defendant: Chelsey Richard Napoleon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ohle v. United States Of America
as 18-2221
Petitioner: John B. Ohle, III
Respondent: United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv06910
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
In Re: Patricia Dalton Ohle
as 17-3985
Petitioner: Patricia Dalton Ohle, Festivus for the Rest of Us, Inc., The Dalton Ohle Investment Property Trust and others
Respondent: United States of America
Defendant: John B. Ohle, III and William E. Bradley
Ohle v. United States of America
as 17-3036
Petitioner - Appellant: John B. Ohle, III
Respondent - Appellee: United States of America
Ohle v. United States of America
as 17-283
Petitioner: John B. Ohle, III
Respondent: United States of America
Ohle v. Frankel & Abrams et al
as 1:2014cv09157
Plaintiff: John B. Ohle, III
Defendant: Frankel & Abrams, Sandor Frankel and The Estate of Stuart E. Abrams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
2002 JBO Trust No 1, et al v. Royal Bank of Canada, et al
as 13-30380
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN B. OHLE, III and DUMAINE GROUP, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, RBC DAIN RAUSCHER, JOHN KRUSE and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Ohle v. United States Of America
as 1:2013cv00450
Petitioner: John B. Ohle, III
Respondent: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Ohle et al (John B. Ohle)
as 12-2193
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: William E. Bradley
Defendant - Appellant: John B. Ohle, III

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?