Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Tyre et al v. Carter et al
as 2:2016cv00110
Plaintiff:
Gary Tyre and Samantha Jacobs
Defendant:
John Carter , Wayne County Sheriff's Department , Robert L. Brantley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Mr. Irvin Enterprises et al
as 1:2015cv02444
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Mr. Irvin Enterprises, Brian Kemp, Fulton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foudy et al v. Indian River County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2014cv14316
Plaintiff:
Shaun Foudy and Toni Foudy
Defendant:
Indian River County Sheriff Office, Deryl Loar, David Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Haynes v. U.C.I. Security et al
as 3:2013cv00954
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
U.C.I. Security, John Carter, Officer Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Kilgore et al
as 3:2013cv00258
Plaintiff:
Paul Kennedy
Defendant:
Bennett Kilgore, Aaron Coleman, Eugene McLemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
as 6:2012cv01704
Plaintiff:
John Carter
Defendant:
BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Thomas v. Steketee et al
as 1:2012cv02105
Plaintiff:
John Carter Thomas
Defendant:
Nick Steketee and City of Anniston, Alabama, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bobby Stribling, Jr. v. Sheriff John Carter, et al
as 11-12404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY REX STRIBLING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN CARTER, Sheriff, GARY JACKSON, Captain, a.k.a. Bo and JAMES BUNCH, Sgt.
Lishields v. Hawley et al
as 2:2010cv14319
Plaintiff:
David Lishields
Defendant:
Robert Hawley, John Carter, Austin Natskakula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
