Cases 1 - 10 of 30
NORTHROP v. EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID NORTHROP
Defendant:
EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC and JOSEPH MAROTTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Hay v. Crown Motor Co.
as 6:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Crown Motor Co.
Plaintiff:
John David Hay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hay v. Pate et al
as 6:2019cv00115
Defendant:
Colby Chace Pate and Randall Noe Hyundai, L.P.
Plaintiff:
John David Hay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
David v. Check-6, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00611
Defendant:
Brian Brurud, Laura Owen, Check-6, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John David
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hooper v. Meacham et al
as 4:2018cv00234
Plaintiff:
John David Hooper
Defendant:
Jeramy Meacham and Fountain Park Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. The Prudential Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2017at01272
Plaintiff:
John David Turner
Defendant:
The Prudential Life Insurance Company of America and Radiological Associates of Sacramento Long Term Disability Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Turner v. The Prudential Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2017cv02490
Plaintiff:
John David Turner
Defendant:
The Prudential Life Insurance Company of America and Radiological Associates of Sacramento Long Term Disability Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
HUBBARD v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID HUBBARD
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Calixtro-Calixtro v. Hodges
as 1:2017cv00394
Plaintiff:
Rafael Calixtro-Calixtro
Defendant:
John David Hodges
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Mebergv. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 9:2015cv81146
Plaintiff:
John David Meberg
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
