Cases 31 - 40 of 40
K-Beech, Inc. v. John Does 1-22
as 5:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
K-Beech, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lorillard Tobacco Company, et al v. Wilson Wholesale & Distributors, et al
as 5:2010cv00480
Plaintiff:
Lorillard Tobacco Company and Lorillard Licensing Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Wilson Wholesale & Distributors , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Galeas Jr. v. Beck et al
as 5:2010ct03086
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas Jr.
Defendant:
Theodis Beck, Boyd Bennett, Ricky Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Holly et al
as 5:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Thomas
Defendant:
R. V. Holly, Pablo Mora, Mark Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Bennett et al
as 5:2009ct03127
Plaintiff:
Adrian Dominic Watkins
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Betty Brown, Becky Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00282
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Owens v. Cavaleri et al
as 5:2009ct03100
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Owens
Defendant:
Mr. Cavaleri, John Doe, 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. City of Knightdale et al
as 5:2009cv00056
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
City of Knightdale, Skip Blaylock, J.T. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thornton v. Harrison et al
as 5:2008cv00043
Plaintiff:
Earl L. Thornton, Jr.
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, Frank Gunter, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cummings v. Lenoir County et al
as 4:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cummings
Defendant:
Lenoir County, Robert Daughtery, W.E. Billy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
