Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Robert Guillory v. Jones County Jail, et al
as 16-60250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT P. GUILLORY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF ALEX HODGE, MAJOR RANDY JOHNSON, CAPTAIN DAVID HARE and others
Siddhar v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2016cv01082
Plaintiff:
Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Jacqueline H. Reynolds and John Does 1 -10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Edwards et al
as 3:2016cv00165
Defendant:
Robert J. Burns, James T. Dixon, Jr., Jay Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Emfinger et al
as 3:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Keon Reginald Douglas
Defendant:
Unknown Emfinger, Randy Harris, District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Hodge et al
as 2:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joel Graham
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Lucille Howard, David Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Rowan et al
as 5:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tarrius D. Holt
Defendant:
Unknown Rowan, Gabriel Walker, Unknown King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeff Burks, et al v. Jeff Price, et al
as 15-40799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFF BURKS and MELYNDA BURKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF JEFF PRICE, DAVID BROWN, PAT BRACK and others
Appellee:
RICKEY TURNER
Carlucci v. Chapa et al
as 3:2015cv00173
Defendant:
R. Arriola, Rachel Chapa, E. Dona and others
Plaintiff:
Gino Carlucci
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: Bivens
Hancock v. Hodge et al
as 2:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hancock
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, David Hare and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roland et al v. City of Meridian, Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Willie Roland , Shuntay Roland , S.J.R. and others
Defendant:
City of Meridian, Mississippi, Don Hopkins, Dean Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
