Cases 11 - 20 of 159
Kennedy v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 4:2022cv11152
Plaintiff:
Korluh Kennedy
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Joseph Osmanski, III, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Tottenham v. DeMoura et al
as 1:2021cv11531
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Tottenham
Defendant:
Douglas A. DeMoura, Sergeant Lodico, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz-Sanchez et al v. Steidel-Figueroa et al
as 3:2021cv01433
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Jane 1 Doe and Maritza Ortiz-Sanchez
Defendant:
Sigfrido Steidel-Figueroa, Damaris Colon, Rowina Rosa-Pimentel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Terrizzi v. ALOFT HOTEL MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv11434
Plaintiff:
Linda Terrizzi
Defendant:
ALOFT HOTEL MANAGEMENT, INC., Aloft Lounge, LLC, Aloft, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodham v. Conway PD et al
as 1:2021fp00600
Plaintiff:
Grace Woodham
Defendant:
Conway PD, FNU Theberge, FNU McGrath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena v. Cacioppo et al
as 1:2021cv10984
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Sergio Cacioppo, Officer McGurn and others
Plaintiff:
Wilson Pena, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bassett v Blitt
as 1:2021cv10899
Defendant:
Cameron Rose doing business as Colton Grey, John Doe #14 doing business as Magdeline St. Michaels, Vivid Canada Entertainment, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leah Bassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Sanchez v. Mici et al
as 1:2021cv10021
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2020cv00503
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #3, Officer S Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Bennett et al
as 1:2020cv11866
Defendant:
Michael Gomes, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
