Cases 51 - 60 of 1,907
Peru v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
CRAIG PERU
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Lozano et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Taylor
Defendant:
J Lozano, John Doe #1 1:24-cv-11, John Doe #2 1:24-cv-11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Thornton
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ramos
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Doe #1, Police Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGee v. Barton
as 24-30038
Plaintiff:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
Falkenburry v. Burns et al
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Frank S Falkenburry
Defendant:
Robert D Burns, Garrett Etherton, Nicholas Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Kurk Johnson
Respondent:
Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knutson, Trabel Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiliams v. Doe #1 1:24-cv-08 et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Williams
Defendant:
John Doe #1 1:24-cv-08, John Doe #2 1:24-cv-08, P Reilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Little et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Allen Ford
Defendant:
R. Little, Major Ford, Jamar A. Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
