Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Robinson et al v. Strickland-Saffold et al
as 1:2020cv01330
Defendant:
Atty. Justin Weatherly, Ofc. John Doe 5, Ofc. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Maiya McCoy and Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Annette Chambers-Smith, Barney and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Interested Party:
State of Ohio, Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Resch v. Municipality of Macomb County et al
as 2:2018cv13607
Defendant:
Anthony Wickersham, Jane Doe 1, Municipality of Macomb County and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Resch
Hadnot v. Farrow et al
as 3:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hadnot
Defendant:
Eric Farrow, Jane Doe, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edison Peoples v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 16-2096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDISON ALEXANDER PEOPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, SCOTT SPRADER, Deputy Warden, DAN LESATZ, Deputy Warden and others
Winn v. Jane Doe #1 et al
as 1:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
Antoine Winn
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Calvin Williams, Cleveland Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv01616
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Long
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Eddy, Elliott Neufeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. City of Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Police Department's Organized Crime Unit et al
as 2:2013cv02166
Plaintiff:
Curtis Keller
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Police Department's Organized Crime Unit, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Doctor John Doe #1 et al
as 2:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Wilder
Defendant:
Doctor John Doe #1, Doctor Orbergon, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. McConnegly et al
as 1:2011cv01288
Plaintiff:
Dan J. Day
Defendant:
C.O. McConnegly, John Doe #1, C.O. Nauss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
