Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Coleman v. Witz et al
as 3:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Coleman, III
Defendant:
Gary Witz , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ashworth v. Witz et al
as 3:2013cv00753
Plaintiff:
Lewis Ashworth
Defendant:
Gary Witz , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Callahan v. Witz et al
as 3:2013cv00752
Plaintiff:
Eddie H. Callahan
Defendant:
Gary Witz , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Driggs v. Witz et al
as 3:2013cv00751
Plaintiff:
William E. Driggs
Defendant:
Gary Witz , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards v. Witz et al
as 3:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
Garland Glenn Edwards
Defendant:
Gary Witz , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Thomas C. Coleman, III , William E. Driggs , Eddie H. Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. The County of Fairfax, Virginia et al
as 1:2013cv00616
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Clark
Defendant:
The County of Fairfax, Virginia, Richard W. Nagel, R. L. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Fain v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 3:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Fain
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2011cv00153
Plaintiff:
Tariq A. Vaughn, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Richmond City Police Department, Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Deena Kaye Myers
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Clyde Alderman, Jerry Streat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2010cv00887
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Knight
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
