Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith v. Pettis County et al
as 2:2022cv04165
Plaintiff:
Donna Smith
Defendant:
Pettis County, Brad Anders, Sam Hargrave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham v. Cooper County, Missouri et al
as 2:2019cv04086
Defendant:
Cooper County, Missouri, John Doe 7, John Doe 8 and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewalt v. Brauner et al
as 4:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Adam Randazzo, John Doe #5, Unknown Eckhoff and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Dewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2018cv05111
Defendant:
John Doe 7, John Doe 6, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
James Albert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Missouri Department of Corrections, et al
as 1:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Angel King
Defendant:
Terry Russell, Scott McFarland, Missouri Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bishop v. Dunn et al
as 1:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Bishop
Defendant:
Charlana Dunn, John Doe #6, John Doe #7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley et al v. Randolph County et al
as 2:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Riley, Sr. and Georgia A. Riley
Defendant:
Randolph County , Mark Nichols , Bobbie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Riley et al v. Randolph County et al
as 4:2011cv00147
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Riley, Sr. and Georgia A. Riley
Defendant:
Randolph County, Mark Nichols, Bobbie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
McClard et al v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2010cv02335
Plaintiff:
Tracy McClard and Dan McClard
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Saint Francois County, City of Bonne Terre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
