Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Simmons v. Dorchester County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv00425
Plaintiff:
Stanley Simmons
Defendant:
Dorchester County Detention Center, Summerville Police Department, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Newburgh v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv03358
Defendant:
Angus International Safety Group, Ltd., National Foam Inc, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and others
Plaintiff:
City of Newburgh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Portee v. Apple Incorporated et al
as 3:2018cv02106
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Portee
Defendant:
Apple Incorporated, Asurion Insurance Services, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schlamp v. American Home Patient Inc et al
as 6:2018cv01893
Defendant:
American Home Patient Inc, Lincare Inc and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Schlamp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pointer v. Nakato SC Inc et al
as 4:2018cv01629
Plaintiff:
Evangeline Pointer
Defendant:
Nakato SC Inc and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Davis Neurology PA v. CBS Medical Inc et al
as 2:2018mc00211
Plaintiff:
Davis Neurology PA
Defendant:
CBS Medical Inc and John Does 1-10
Movant:
Andrew Chmiel and Do-Delivery LLC
Pecora v. The Big M Casino Inc et al
as 4:2018cv01422
Plaintiff:
Michael Pecora
Defendant:
The Big M Casino Inc and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Kincannon v. Kirkland et al
as 3:2018cv00945
Plaintiff:
J. Todd Kincannon
Defendant:
Eric Kirkland, Nicole Howland, John Does #1-#10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlock et al v. Hudson Seafood Corporation et al
as 9:2018cv00590
Plaintiff:
Lydia Carlock and Nicolas Fabrizio
Defendant:
Hudson Seafood Corporation and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
