Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Starkey v. O.C. Seacrets, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02490
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Starkey
Defendant:
O.C. Seacrets, Inc., Louis B. Lombardo and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Merideth v. Prince George's County et al
as 8:2019cv03198
Defendant:
Prince George's County, John Doe Officer 2, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Lionel Merideth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grant v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2017cv02816
Plaintiff:
Jordan Matthew Grant
Defendant:
State of Maryland, John C. Wobensmith, District Court of Maryland for Montgomery County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. Off. Evans et al
as 8:2015cv02151
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Wilson
Defendant:
Off. Evans, Sgt. Lasher, Vincent J. Lark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Patel et al
as 8:2014cv03965
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Rakeshkumar M Patel, Shilpaben B Patel, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: The Cable & Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992
A-Pinn Contracting, LLC et al v. Miller Pipeline LLC, et al
as 1:2013cv00664
Plaintiff:
A-Pinn Contracting, LLC and Eugene Pinder
Defendant:
Ventrusca Enterprises , Miller Pipeline LLC , Midas Utilities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Owens-El, et al v. Kapfhammer et al
as 1:2010cv03213
Defendant:
Kapfhammer , John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Luecretia Dawn Owens-El and Che' Quadaffi Williams-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Visual Language Interpreting Inc. v. Weinterpret.Net et al
as 1:2007cv02775
Plaintiff:
Visual Language Interpreting Inc.
Defendant:
Weinterpret.Net, David Isaacs Stephenson, Angela K. Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
