Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Torres v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv01046
Defendant:
D Scrogum, J Krasnican, Randy Pfister and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv06359
Defendant:
R. Williams, John Doe One, J. Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Nestle Purina Petcare Company et al
as 1:2017cv04378
Defendant:
Nestle Purina Petcare Company, Zerochaos, LLC and John Doe One Through Ten
Plaintiff:
Deborah Cooper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gervil St. Louis a/k/a St. Louis Gervil et al v. Carrier et al
as 3:2016mc00018
Plaintiff:
Gervil St. Louis
Defendant:
Paul E Carrier, Hope E Carter, Fairfield University and others
Respondent:
Teresa Buehler
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Labriola v. Clinton Entertainment Management LLC. et al
as 1:2015cv04123
Plaintiff:
Michelle Labriola
Defendant:
Clinton Entertainment Management LLC., John Doe One and John Doe Two
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Anderson v. City Of Rockford et al.
as 3:2015cv50065
Plaintiff:
Tyjuan Anderson
Defendant:
City Of Rockford , Dominic Iasparro , Joseph Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nitz v. Doe et al
as 1:2008cv00334
Plaintiff:
Herman L Nitz, Jr
Defendant:
Tony Doe, Jean Harvey, Officer Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv00554
Plaintiff:
Doris Andrews, Doris Andrews and Doris Andrews
Defendant:
City of Chicago and John Does One and Two
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ellison v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv00524
Plaintiff:
Erick Ellison, Erick Ellison and Erick Ellison
Defendant:
City of Chicago and John Does One and Two
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
