Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Murithi et al v. Godnez et al
as 1:2022cv06023
Plaintiff:
Mwenda Murithi
Defendant:
Salvador A Godnez, Sherry Benton, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson, Marcus v. John Does #1 and #2 et al
as 3:2021cv00769
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anderson
Defendant:
John Doees #1 and #2, Jeff Schwanz, Ryan Hallaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilliard v. Illinois Department of Corr et al
as 3:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Hilliard
Defendant:
James Luth and John Does #1 and #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv03997
Plaintiff:
Dante Gaines
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and John Does 1 Through 2 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall King v. Robert McCarty, et al
as 13-1769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL KING
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MCCARTY and JOHN DOES, #1 and #2
THE PEOPLES STATE BANK v. STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2010cv01640
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1 AND 2, RONALD KRUSZEWSKI, STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
THE PEOPLES STATE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Holmes v. Wiess et al
as 1:2010cv07092
Plaintiff:
Quentin M Holmes
Defendant:
Jody Wiess, John Doe 1 and 2 and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman (Brown) v. Snooks et al
as 1:2010cv06339
Plaintiff:
Kendell Bowman (Brown)
Defendant:
Superintendent Snooks, Sergeant Brandon, Officer Maas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenny et al V. Weis et al
as 1:2010cv05365
Plaintiff:
Leslie Kenny
Defendant:
Jody Weis, Officer Rodriguez, Office Proano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balli v. Wisconsin Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Balli
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department Of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Amy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
