Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Piper Partridge, et al v. City of Benton, Arkansas, et al
as 24-1780
Plaintiff:
Piper Partridge, Individually as mother and next of kin to Keagan Schweikle and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Keagan Schweikle and Dominic Schweikle, Individually as father and next of kin to Keagan Schweikle
Defendant:
City of Benton, Arkansas, Kyle Ellison, Individually and as Employee of City of Benton, Arkansas, Kirk Lane, Individually and as Employee of City of Benton, Arkansas and others
Piper Partridge, et al v. City of Benton, Arkansas, et al
as 21-3001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Piper Partridge, Individually as mother and next of kin to Keagan Schweikle and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Keagan Schweikle and Dominic Schweikle, Individually as father and next of kin to Keagan Schweikle
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Benton, Arkansas, Kyle Ellison, Individually and as Employee of City of Benton, Arkansas, Kirk Lane, Individually and as Employee of City of Benton, Arkansas and others
Brint Clark v. M. Martinez, et al
as 21-55933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRINT EARL CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
FACILITY LT. M. MARTINEZ, individual/official capacity, SGT. R. MARSHALL, individual/official capacity, SGT. R. GARCIA, individual/official capacity and others
Nicholson v. Newton Municipal School District et al
as 3:2019cv00703
Defendant:
Newton Municipal School District and John Does 1-20, Individually
Plaintiff:
Billy Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Allan Bogutz v. State of Arizona, et al
as 09-16411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLAN BOGUTZ, as conservator for minors G.M. and Z.M.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, DEPARTMENT OF ARIZONA ECONOMIC SECURITY, Administration for Children, Youth and Families, a department of administration of the State of Arizona, DEBORAH HEADEN, individually and in her office capacity as an employee of the State of Arizona and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
