Cases 71 - 80 of 118
WILLIAMS v. LOMAS TRAVEL et al
as 2:2013cv03925
Plaintiff:
LESLIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LOMAS TRAVEL, FUN JET, VACATIONS TO GO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PIERSON v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al
as 2:2013cv03645
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. PIERSON
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK , BANK OF AMERICA , JOHN DOES 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Tormu Prall v. Supreme Court, et al
as 13-2313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT and others
BRAGG v. MISZAC et al
as 3:2013cv01193
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
MISZAC, C. JAMES, STEVE DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. DEANE et al
as 2:2013cv00979
Plaintiff:
KATHY TAYLOR , JAHQUAN SPURGEON , NAQUEL MYERS and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. DEANE, FEDEX FREIGHT EAST and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
GIBSON v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
CARLTON GIBSON
Defendant:
CARL ROBINSON, JR., JOHN DOE #1-4 and BOROUGH OF NORRISTOWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In Re: Tormu E. Prall, et al
as 12-3947
Petitioner:
TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT and others
THOMPSON et al v. PYE et al
as 3:2012cv04529
Plaintiff:
GLORIA THOMPSON and LOIS BRIDGEWATER
Defendant:
DAVID EDWARD PYE, SUNBELT RENTALS, INC., CHERYL FOUNTAIN WOODSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KATSOUDAS v. DALE et al
as 2:2012cv03661
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIOUS K. KATSOUDAS
Defendant:
LA TOY A RENEE DALE, DENITA CODON BLAKE, JOHN DOE 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEONARD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv02459
Plaintiff:
GALVASTER LEONARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
