Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Kendrick v. McDermott et al
as 1:2024cv05469
Defendant:
Thomas McDermott, Jr., John Does #1-4 and Hammond Police Officers/Chief
Plaintiff:
Herbert N. Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Goings v. Nodine et al
as 1:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Frederick Goings
Defendant:
Scott S. Nodine, T. Woodcock, John Does 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gandara v. Kane County et al
as 1:2021cv03819
Plaintiff:
Antonio Gandara, Sr.
Defendant:
Kane County, Kane County Sheriff Hain, Nina FLEMING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lippert v. Kohn et al
as 3:2021cv00423
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Lacie Livingston, Travis Bayler and others
Plaintiff:
Don Lippert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguilar v. Barnes et al
as 1:2020cv04661
Plaintiff:
Armando Martinez Aguilar
Defendant:
Onuoha Jude, John Does 1-4 and Nanette Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sterling et al v. Evanston Township High School District 202 et al
as 1:2019cv05599
Defendant:
Marvin Rhone, John Doe Evanston Officers (1-4), Michael Haywood and others
Plaintiff:
Sophia Sterling and Jorie Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Pinckneyville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2019cv00423
Defendant:
Pinckneyville Correctional Center, Thomas Lehman, John Does #1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Lendell Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantrell v. Cook County et al
as 1:2018cv07008
Defendant:
David Leist, Officer Kim, Cook County and others
Plaintiff:
Seena Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. Does #1-4
as 3:2018cv01864
Defendant:
John Does #1-4
Plaintiff:
James A. Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv05283
Plaintiff:
Howard Ray, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe 1-4 and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
