Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Jones v. Midwest Rehab Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv06774
Plaintiff:
Duane M Jones
Defendant:
Midwest Rehab Inc., State of Illinois, Cook County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pratt v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv03158
Plaintiff:
Simone Pratt
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Police Department, PETER RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woods et al v. Carroll County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2007cv00094
Plaintiff:
Randall J. Woods and Tracy (Ms. Randall J) Woods
Defendant:
Carroll County, Mississippi, Donald Gray, Michael Spellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Tyson v. Dykes et al
as 2:2007cv00075
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyson
Defendant:
Larry Dykes, Larry Dykes, Jones County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Weilburg v. Funk
as 2:2007cv00715
Plaintiff:
Daro C Weilburg, Jr
Defendant:
Luann Funk, Hedda Westlake and Jane and John Does A-Z
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hodge v. Flynn et al
as 2:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
William E. Hodge
Defendant:
Kevin Flynn, Kevin Flynn, Tom Eason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THE LIGHTHOUSE INSTI, et al v. THE CITY OF LONG BRA, et al
as 2:2000cv03366
Plaintiff:
THE LIGHTHOUSE INSTITUTE FOR EVANGELISM, INC. and KEVIN BROWN
Defendant:
ABRAMS GRATTA & FALVO, P.C., , PETER S. FALVO , JOHN DOES A-Z and others
Cross_claimant:
ABRAMS GRATTA & FALVO, P.C., and PETER S. FALVO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
