Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WILLIAM'S v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AT SCI SMITHFIELD STAFF et al
as 2:2012cv07218
Plaintiff:
TOBEY WILLIAM'S
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AT SCI SMITHFIELD STAFF, JON D. FISHER, WHITESEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITMORE v. THE PROSECUTION DEPT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA PA et al
as 2:2012cv06538
Plaintiff:
SHRIEFF WHITMORE
Defendant:
THE PROSECUTION DEPT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA PA, ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS POLICE DEPT OFFICERS JOHN DOW'S OF THE SAID CASE and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitmore v. The Prosecution Dept of Criminal Justice Center of Philadelphia PA et al
as 1:2012cv02297
Petitioner:
Shrieff Whitmore
Respondent:
The Prosecution Dept of Criminal Justice Center of Philadelphia PA, Additional Defendents Police Dept Officers John Dow's of the said case and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEST MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. ACCURAY, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01194
Plaintiff:
BEST MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
ACCURAY, INC., ROBERT HILL, DAVID SPELLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MOORE v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2009cv01093
Plaintiff:
GREGORY C. MOORE, ESQ.
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY, JOHN R. WALTON, PAUL CARNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Beard et al
as 3:2009cv00886
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Johnson
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard, C. Garman, Raymond Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAUNDERS v. POWELL et al
as 2:2008cv05839
Plaintiff:
ESTHER SAUNDERS
Defendant:
DENNIS POWELL and JOHN DOW 1,2,3,4
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DOW v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2008cv05264
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOW
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
