Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 61
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1902
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1731
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1686
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1633
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1477
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Colondres v. Potter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01171
Plaintiff: Angieliz Colondres
Defendant: John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2348
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11945
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hara v. Office of Personal Management, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEAN HARA
Plaintiff: NANCY GILL, MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, MARTIN KOSKI and others
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Defendant: HILARY CLINTON
Intervenor: LAMAR S. SMITH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?