Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Barker v. The Bancorp, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00869
Defendant:
The Bancorp, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Edward Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Melendez v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
as 1:2020cv06620
Defendant:
Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Edward Melendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct
Bowe v. Wilson et al
as 8:2018cv00992
Plaintiff:
John Edward Bowe
Defendant:
Tom Wilson, Allstate Insurance Co. and Allstate Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Alfano et al v. Zocdoc, Inc.,
as 1:2018cv02558
Plaintiff:
Margaret Alfano , Shaan Kastuar , Ruth Hertzberg and others
Defendant:
Zocdoc, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gaddy v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv08960
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Joseph Ponte, Martin Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ragusa et al v. Pence et al
as 1:2014cv03772
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Ragusa and Mary Luisi-Ragusa
Defendant:
John Edward Pence , Rain Bird Corporation and Hertz Vehicles LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Pippins v. KPMG LLP
as 13-889
Plaintiff:
Lisa B. Fraley, Stephen Marsala, Jr., Joshua Adam Mandelberger and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kyle Pippins, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jamie Schindler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Edward Lambert
Defendant - Appellee:
KPMG LLP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pfalzer v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00659
Plaintiff:
John Edward Pfalzer
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Collier v. Harter
as 12-2305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johnny James Collier
Defendant:
Mary Burrell, K. Ryders, Rick Winney and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Benjamin C. Agustin, Anthony Diperio, Deb Harter and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
