Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Dana Gold, et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 17-80246
Plaintiff - Respondent:
DANA GOLD, TAMMY EMERY, RUSSELL DORNON and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Dana Gold, et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 17-80246
Respondent:
DANA GOLD, TAMMY EMERY, RUSSELL DORNON and others
Petitioner:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
USA v. John Foster
as 17-1703
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN FOSTER
Carolyn Barnes v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 16-50142
Defendant / Appellee:
JAKE LNU, BURT CARNES, in his personal capacity, PAUL BOGAN, in his personal capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROLYN BARNES, individually and on behalf of her children
Dana Gold et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 3:2014cv05373
Plaintiff:
Dana Gold, Tammy Emery, Russell Dornon and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Benjamin Faber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foster et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-14730
Plaintiff:
Nancy Foster and John Foster
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc.
United States v. Foster
as 13-6100
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOHN FOSTER
In Re: Christine M. Durose
as 13-1152
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTINE MICHELLE DUROSE, Administrator of the Estate of Kil Sun Flom and JENNIFER LYNN ST. JOHN-FOSTER, Administrator of the Estate of Kil Sun Flom
:
and
Stephen Yagman v. Dale Kristopher Galipo et al
as 2:2012cv07908
Defendant:
Leroy David Baca, David Eichenlaub, Margaret Eichenlaub and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
United States of America v. Jones (Richardson)
as 12-1220
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luke Jones, AKA Mega, Lance Jones, Lonnie Jones, AKA LT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kenneth Richardson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
