Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Norris v. Stonebreaker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv06165
Petitioner: John Foster Norris
Respondent: Warden Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 23-3941
Petitioner: JOHN FOSTER NORRIS
Respondent: DONNIE STONEBREAKER, JR.
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 23-3753
Petitioner: JOHN FOSTER NORRIS
Respondent: DONNIE STONEBREAKER, JR., WARDEN
Dana Gold et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 3:2014cv05373
Plaintiff: Dana Gold, Tammy Emery, Russell Dornon and others
Defendant: Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Benjamin Faber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
METAL ONE AMERICA, INC. v. KURT ORBAN PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 3:2021mc80300
Plaintiff: METAL ONE AMERICA, INC.
Defendant: KURT ORBAN PARTNERS, LLC, Kurt Matt Orban and John Foster
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Applegate v. Hollingsworth et al
as 6:2018cv02218
Defendant: J. Nelson, Steven Borst, John Foster and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Gary Applegate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dana Gold, et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 17-80246
Respondent: DANA GOLD, TAMMY EMERY, RUSSELL DORNON and others
Petitioner: LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Dana Gold, et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 17-80246
Plaintiff - Respondent: DANA GOLD, TAMMY EMERY, RUSSELL DORNON and others
Defendant - Petitioner: LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Jackson v. Foster et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02145
Plaintiff: Charles A. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant: John Foster and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holman v. Obama We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00011
Plaintiff: John Foster Holman
Defendant: Barack Hussein Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?