Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. UVC, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04964
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
UVC, INC. doing business as MILLCREEK TAVERN and JOHN GILLESPIE
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. UVC, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03185
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , UNIVERSAL-SONGS OF POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. , UNIVERSAL-MILLHOUSE MUSIC and others
Defendant:
UVC, INC. and JOHN GILLESPIE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
James Singer v. Bureau of Professional & Occup, et al
as 14-2970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. SINGER
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL & OCCUPATIONAL AFFAIRS, BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL AFFAIRS STATE BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY, FRANK MONACO and others
Singer v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs et al.
as 3:2013cv03059
Plaintiff:
James M. Singer
Defendant:
Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, State Board of Psychology, Frank Monaco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RAO v. DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2008cv03553
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANTHONY RAO
Defendant:
DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP, DEPTFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN GILLESPIE and others
Cross Claimant:
DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP and DEPTFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cross Defendant:
JOHN GILLESPIE, TIMOTHY B. PARKS and MICHAEL BRAZELTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEONE et al v. PORTER et al
as 1:2008cv01043
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEONE, JOHN GILLESPIE, TIMOTHY PARKS and others
Defendant:
JOHN PORTER, TOWNSHIP OF DEPTFORD, JOHN MAROLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAO v. DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2008cv00370
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANTHONY RAO
Defendant:
DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP, DEPTFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN GILLESPIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALLACE v. STREET et al
as 2:2007cv03867
Plaintiff:
MALIK WALLACE
Defendant:
JOHN STREET, SVESTER JOHNSON, GERALD ROCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
