Cases 41 - 50 of 154
Mitchell v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2017cv00819
Plaintiff:
Merl Mitchell
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Rick Raemish, Tiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertolo et al v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00773
Plaintiff:
James Michael Bertolo
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 17-1105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY C. HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, RICK RAEMISCH, SEAN FOSTER and others
Navarro v. USA et al
as 1:2017cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jim Navarro
Defendant:
USA, State of Colorado, The, State of Illinois, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Jim Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America, The State of Colorado, The State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 16-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORREY V. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, JOHN/JANE DOE, U.S. Probation Dept, KURT PIERPOINT, U.S. Probation Officer and others
Faircloth v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv02929
Plaintiff:
James Faircloth
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, John (I) Hickenlooper, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blalack v. Wagner et al
as 1:2016cv02811
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Blalack, III
Defendant:
Brian Wagner, Brian (I) Wagner, David Salaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv02579
Plaintiff:
Luis Alfonso Solares Ramirez
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Rick Raemish, Tiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMIREZ v. HICKENLOOPER et al
as 1:2016cv01882
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALFONSO SOLARES RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, RICK RAEMISH, TIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
