Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Franklin v. Johns Hopkins Hospital
as 1:2023cv02838
Plaintiff:
Kelly Jerome Franklin
Defendant:
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPHARD v. HOPKINS et al
as 1:2023cv03129
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
JOHN HOPKINS, DENNIS KONICKI, ARRON REGGINAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weddington v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Weddington
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Nines, North Branch Correctional Inst., Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Weddington v. Nines, et al.
as 1:2021cv03035
Plaintiff:
Robert Clifford Weddington
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Nines, North Branch Correctional Inst., Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Weddington v. Prime Care Medical et al
as 8:2019cv02175
Plaintiff:
Robert Clifford Weddington
Defendant:
Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Inst. and Prime Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hargett v. Johns Hopkins Hospital et al
as 1:2017cv01119
Plaintiff:
Kim L. Hargett, Sr.
Defendant:
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Raymond Neil Borland, Thomas J. Polasck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Modrall v. Johns Hopkins University, et al
as 16-7095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert G. Modrall
Defendant - Appellee:
Johns Hopkins University, SAIS, Peter Lewis, Sarah Cook and others
MODRALL v. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2016cv01566
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. MODRALL
Defendant:
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, PETER LEWIS, SARAH COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilder et al v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00036
Plaintiff:
Gatlin Gilder, Jr. and Geraldine Alford
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, John Hopkins, Jesse Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
