Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Arroyo v. Vergakis et al
as 2:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
John Vergakis, John Doe, John Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. Kelly et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Cpt. "John" Backaraff, The City of Portsmouth, The State of Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421
Macdah v. Cropp et al
as 3:2017cv00219
Petitioner:
Maher El Macdah
Respondent:
Richard Cropp, M. Yvonne Evans, Thomas Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edwards v. Crawford et al
as 2:2017cv00122
Petitioner:
David O. Edwards
Respondent:
Jeffery Crawford, M. Yvonne Evans, Philip T. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00222
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aziz et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2017cv00116
Respondent:
Donald Trump , U.S. Department of Homeland Security , U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Amicu:
Anti-Defamation League , Americans United for Separation of Church and State , Southern Poverty Law Center and others
Defendant:
Muslim Advocates
Movant:
Victor Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stewart v. The University of North Carolina System et al
as 1:2015cv01487
Plaintiff:
Fenyang Ajamu Stewart
Defendant:
The University of North Carolina System, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University, National Institute of Aerospace Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
