Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv05696
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Application for Naturalization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Application for Naturalization
Kramer et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017cv02645
Plaintiff:
John Kramer and Beth Kramer
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baca et al v. Sabine River Authority
as 3:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
Erica Jill Baca, Marko Baca, Arlis Barrow and others
Defendant:
Sabine River Authority, State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Libertarian Party of Illinois, et al v. John Cunningham
as 16-1775
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF ILLINOIS, LUPE DIAZ, Chair of LPI, JULIA A. FOX, Prospective Candidate and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN A. CUNNINGHAM, in his Official Capacity as Kane County Clerk
Libertarian Party of Illinois, et al v. Charles W. Scholz, et al
as 16-1667
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF ILLINOIS, LUPE DIAZ, JULIA A. FOX and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CHARLES W. SCHOLZ, ERNEST L. GOWEN and others
Kramer v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00787
Plaintiff:
John Kramer
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv03801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
