Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03643
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-14271
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee: USA, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and others
Pence v. McHugh
as 1:2010cv02299
Plaintiff: Waymon Pence
Defendant: John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall v. McHugh et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00030
Petitioner: Marc Hall
Respondent: John McHugh, John McHugh, Jeffrey Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. Paul Souza, et al
as 10-10370
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, a District of Columbia Non-Profit Corporation, CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, a Florida Non-Profit Corporation, COLLIER COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY, a Florida Non-Profit Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant: PAUL SOUZA, Field Supervisor, South Florida Ecological Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, STEVE SULLIVAN, Chief, South Permits Branch, Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Division, JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Army and others
Dauphin v. McHugh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00156
Plaintiff: Robert Theophilus Dauphin
Defendant: John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?