Cases 31 - 40 of 59
United States v. Lerma
as 13-2100
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL LERMA
Maurer v. United Recovery Group et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gerald Maurer
Defendant:
United Recovery Group, URG LLC, SRL & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kelly v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2012cv01270
Petitioner:
John Michael Kelly
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chen v. United Recovery Group et al
as 2:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Tim Chen
Defendant:
United Recovery Group, URG LLC, SRL & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lerma v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00685
Plaintiff:
John Michael Lerma
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Quinn et al v. Young et al
as 1:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
John Michael Quinn and Lavern Gonzalez
Defendant:
William Leon Young, Benjamin Melendrez, Louis Armijo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. Daniels
as 1:2011cv03261
Petitioner:
John Michael Pope
Respondent:
Charlie Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Broadus v. Timme, et al
as 11-1337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL BROADUS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAE TIMME, Warden, JACKIE MCCALL, Lieutenant, DIRECTO, Lieutenant and others
Kasparek, et al v. Morris, et al
as 11-3206
Debtor - Debtor:
In the Matter of: JONATHON W. KASPAREK, AKA J. W. Kasparek and MANDY K. KASPAREK, AKA Mandy K. Hawn
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN MICHAEL MORRIS, Trustee
Defendant - Appellant:
WAYNE A. KASPAREK
Defendant:
JAMES KASPAREK and JONATHON W. KASPAREK, AKA J. W. Kasparek
Ford v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2011cv00229
Plaintiff:
John Michael Ford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
