Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Jackson v. Barrera et al
as 9:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jackson
Defendant:
M. Barrera, Rachel St. Mary, K. Santo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARD v. PECK et al
as 2:2018cv00130
Petitioner:
THOMAS P. RICHARD, SR.
Respondent:
JOHN PECK, BARBARA JOLLIE, WESTMORELAND COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARD v. PECK et al
as 2:2018cv00234
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. RICHARD, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN PECK, BARBARA JOLLIE, WESTMORELAND COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. COZZA et al
as 2:2017cv01658
Petitioner:
JAMES C. YOUNG
Respondent:
MARK COZZA, JOSH SHAPIRO, JOHN PECK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Josh Thomas v. Brian Roberts, et al
as 17-16363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSH THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN ROBERTS, EDWARD MARTINEZ, ROBERT DOYLE and others
Shawn Hawk v. CDCR, et al
as 16-16885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN HAWK
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, FORENSIC ASSESSMENT DIVISION and others
Thomas v. Roberts et al
as 2:2016cv00724
Plaintiff:
Josh Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Roberts, Edward Martinez, Robert Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PECK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01512
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOHN PECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Herrera v. Gallegos et al
as 2:2015cv02536
Plaintiff:
Armando Herrera
Defendant:
Gallegos, John Peck, Steven Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv02529
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Parole Hearings, Forensic Assessment Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
