Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Sears v. Cooper et al
as 2:2021cv00813
Defendant:
Alabama Attorney General, John R Cooper, John Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
S R Sears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eyster et al v. Alabama Department of Transportation et al
as 5:2020cv00172
Plaintiff:
Susan Noble, John C. Eyster, James S. Speake and others
Defendant:
Mark Barlett, Federal Highway Administration, Alabama Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
LW Properties, LLC et al v. Cooper (CONSENT)
as 2:2019cv00019
Plaintiff:
LW Properties, LLC, Capitol Service Stations, Inc., Aaryan & Pratha, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Transportation and John R. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnathan Austin, et al v. Alabama Department of Transpor, et al
as 17-10252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN AUSTIN, RANDALL WOODFIN, JAMES CLARK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, JOHN R. COOPER, Director, ALDOT, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
