Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hyde-Rhodes v. Rhodes
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Kim Hyde-Rhodes
Defendant:
Ted John Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Robinson v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Sheena Robinson
Defendant:
Officer John Rhodes, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
RHODES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12540
Plaintiff:
MARY RHODES and JOHN RHODES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kim Hyde-Rhodes v. Ted Rhodes
as 21-35716
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE-RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
TED JOHN RHODES
Kim Hyde-Rhodes v. Mike Welker, et al
as 21-35713
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE-RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBERT CROWLEY, Jefferson County 83442, MIKE WELKER, MISTY WELKER and others
Hyde-Rhodes v. Welker et al
as 4:2020cv00598
Defendant:
Misty Welker, Mike Welker, Idaho Health and Welfare and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Hyde-Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hyde-Rhodes v. Rhodes
as 4:2020cv00599
Plaintiff:
Kim Hyde-Rhodes
Defendant:
Ted John Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RHODES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52885
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrell v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2020cv00040
Plaintiff:
Reginald Harrell
Defendant:
Nation Wide Transportation LLC and John Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dr. Elliot McGucken v. Vacation Rental in Mammoth et al
as 2:2019cv10251
Defendant:
Vacation Rental in Mammoth, Kenneth John Rhode and DOES 1-25
Plaintiff:
Elliot McGucken
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
