Cases 1 - 10 of 642
Joe Alter v. Neil Gorsuch et al
as 2:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
Joe Alter and Joseph Scott Alter
Defendant:
Neil Gorsuch, John G. Roberts, Clarence Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Demos v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2279
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DONALD J. TRUMP
Raiser v. Gelmis, et al.
as 24-2163
Plaintiff:
AARON RAISER
Defendant:
SUSAN GELMIS, ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America and Donald J Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fealy v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01825
Plaintiff:
John Robert Fealy
Defendant:
United States of America, Department Of The Treasury, Internal Revenue Service doing business as Elain Dean Curry for Kristina L. Lincoln and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Demos Jr. v. USA et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos Jr.
Respondent:
USA and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Bayer, et al.
as 24-828
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP, M. MORENO, Major Hearings Officer, WSP and others
Demos v. Trump
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 9:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 3:2023cv06191
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
