Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SMITH v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
TROOPER ADAM ROBERTS, TROOPER BRIAN ROBERTS, TROOPER CHADWICK ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Buckelew v. Darby et al
as 8:2020cv02511
Defendant:
Thomas Knight, John Robertson, Russell Luce and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Buckelew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez Trujillo v. Town of American Canyon et al
as 3:2018cv05519
Defendant:
Officer Jeremiah Bohlander, Sheriff John Robertson, Chief of Police Oscar Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Perez Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquez et al v. City of San Leandro et al
as 3:2017cv01015
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Marquez and Christian Marquez
Defendant:
City of San Leandro, Matthew Barajas, John Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trammell v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00371
Defendant:
City of New York, Terrence Creighton, Trebor Evans and others
Plaintiff:
David Trammell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALES et al v. FELL et al
as 2:2012cv03495
Plaintiff:
JEROME HALES , JOHN ROBERTSON and MIKEEM BRIGMAN
Defendant:
CHARLES FELL , TIMOTHY GARRON , MEYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv09463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fields v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv01168
Plaintiff:
Nathson E. Fields
Defendant:
City of Chicago, County of Cook, Office of Cook County State's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
