Cases 1 - 10 of 14
ROBINSON v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2023cv03625
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBINSON
Defendant:
PATRICIA MCGILL and DEIRDRE ODUFU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHMIEL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01691
Defendant:
CHCA WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. MIN HI PARK, DR. SMYTH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHMIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foderingham v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Glasco Foderingham
Defendant:
John Wetzel , Paul Noel , Brian Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Johnson v. Emelia Caputo, et al
as 17-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER ALLEN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EMELIA CAPUTO, DR. VICTORIA GRESSNER, DEBORAH WILSON and others
Hollihan v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Richard Hollihan
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Bryan Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. SHARTLE et al
as 1:2013cv07877
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF UNION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. SHARTLE et al
as 2:2013cv06976
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
J. T. SHARTLE and HARRY MOSKOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. SHARTLE et al
as 2:2013cv05606
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF UNION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 2:2013cv00756
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBINSON
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOE, ET.AL.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2011cv06074
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and PAULA T. DOW, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
