Cases 11 - 20 of 36
BAYLOR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2011cv06413
Plaintiff:
TROY BAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DEPUTY ____PIERCE, DEPUTY _______ TARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROE v. SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2010cv00543
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT, DONALD J. TYLINSKI, MARK KORCINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODGERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv00954
Plaintiff:
THEODORE RODGERS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JANE DOE, POLICE OFFICER, JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAUDE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv01767
Plaintiff:
JAMES MAUDE and JAMES MAUDE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., JANE DOE(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAEZ v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv04327
Plaintiff:
LUIS G. BAEZ, SR.
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEWIS v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv04296
Plaintiff:
HASON L. LEWIS
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KEARSE v. NOTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03628
Plaintiff:
RONDEL J. KEARSE
Defendant:
NOTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MEUSA v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03291
Plaintiff:
TROY A. MEUSA
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL , INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HARRIS v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv03142
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN HARRIS
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL , INC., WILLIAM SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROE v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79468
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROE
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
