Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GOODE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2017cv12064
Plaintiff: YVONNE GOODE
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICKETTI, D.P.M. v. BARRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv06804
Plaintiff: JAMES C. RICKETTI, D.P.M.
Defendant: SHAUN P. BARRY , RESTORIXHEALTH , JOHN DOES, D.P.M., 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1662
Plaintiff: Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Akil Sachveda and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ibrahim Turkmen, Akhil Sachdeva, Anser Mehmood and others
Defendant - Appellee: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-999
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: James Sherman
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1003
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Salvatore LoPresti, MDC Captain
Turkmen v. Ashcroft We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-981
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Warden Dennis Hasty, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center(MDC), James Sherman, Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv06960
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATERS v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01715
Plaintiff: CRAIG WATERS
Defendant: ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and JOHN ROES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goodman et al v. St. Paul, City of et al
as 0:2010cv01966
Plaintiff: Amy Goodman , Nicole Salazar and Sharif Abdel Kouddous
Defendant: St. Paul, City of, Minneapolis, City of, Ramsey, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?