Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Creative Bus Sales, Inc. v. Four Suns, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00946
Counter Defendant:
Creative Bus Sales, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Creative Bus Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Does, Four Suns, Inc., Anne Smith and others
Counter Claimant:
Four Suns, Inc., Anne Smith and John Smith
Los Padres Forestwatch et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2016cv09041
Plaintiff:
California Chaparral Institute and Los Padres Forestwatch
Defendant:
John Smith, - and United States Forest Service
Betteroads Asphalt, LLC, et al v. Arevenca Refinery Complex et al
as 3:2016cv02163
Defendant:
Arevenca Refinery Complex, Arevenca S.L., Arevenca Aktm and others
Plaintiff:
Betteroads Asphalt, LLC and Betterecycling Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Smith v. Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch, Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
John Smith v. A-Check America Inc
as 5:2016cv00174
Defendant:
A-Check America Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Smith
William M. Windsor v. Ginger Snap, et al
as 15-3702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William M. Windsor
Defendant - Appellee:
Ginger Snap, Yappy, Ollie Reader and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Maurikia Lyda, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 15-2236
Debtor:
In re: CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Appellant:
MAURIKIA LYDA, JOHN SMITH, NICOLE HILL and others
Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI and DETROIT WATER AND SEWERAGE DEPARTMENT
SMITH v. A-CHECK GLOBAL et al
as 2:2015cv04702
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
A-CHECK GLOBAL and RICOH LOGISTICS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Windsor v. Snap et al
as 4:2015mc00098
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Defendant:
Ginger Snap, Yappy, Ollie Reader and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
