Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SMITH v. FALCONER et al
as 1:2021cv00658
Defendant: FALCONER, WEXFORD OF INDIANA and WHITAKER
Plaintiff: JOHN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WANG v. PALMER et al
as 4:2019cv00203
Defendant: JEFFERY KENNEDY, JOHN SMITH, MARK PALMER and others
Plaintiff: TIAN HUEI WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WANG v. PALMER et al
as 1:2019cv03988
Defendant: JEFFERY KENNEDY, JOHN SMITH, MARK PALMER and others
Plaintiff: TIAN HUEI WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01323
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff: JOHN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2019cv00327
Defendant: NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff: JOHN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. WARDEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00051
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and WARDEN
Petitioner: JOHN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRATT v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02948
Defendant: CORECIVIC, INC., JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff: LEE PRATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00109
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: John Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00613
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
United States Department of Labor v. Smith et al
as 4:2011cv00067
Plaintiff: United States Department of Labor
Defendant: John Smith, II and Tricad Inc 401K Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?