Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Joyce Rowley v. City of North Myrtle Beach We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1993
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOYCE E. ROWLEY
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, JOEL DAVIS, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach, KEVIN BLAYTON, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach and others
Joyce Rowley v. City of North Myrtle Beach
as 09-182
Petitioner: JOYCE E. ROWLEY
Respondent: CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, JOEL DAVIS, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach, KEVIN BLAYTON, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach and others
Joyce Rowley v. City of North Myrtle Beach
as 09-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOYCE E. ROWLEY
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, JOEL DAVIS, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach, KEVIN BLAYTON, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1773
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Smithson v. Adams, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-15273
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS JOHN SMITHSON
Respondent - Appellee: DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, JEANNE S. WOODFORD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Rowley v. North Myrtle Beach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv01636
Defendant: City Of North Myrtle Beach, Douglas Maddock, Joel Davis and others
Plaintiff: Joyce E Rowley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv01179
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?