Cases 31 - 40 of 225
Powers et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv01506
Plaintiff:
Douglas Miller, Jeffery Kout, ROES 1-50 and others
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 50 and Northrop Grumman Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Thompson v. Razavi et al
as 5:2020cv04292
Defendant:
Singh, Eric Razavi and Tarrara
Plaintiff:
John William Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thompson v. Razavi et al
as 2:2020cv00474
Defendant:
Singh, Eric Razavi and Tarrara
Plaintiff:
John William Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas John Williams v. Andrew Saul
as 8:2019cv02256
Plaintiff:
Douglas John Williams
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blankenship v. Coconino, County of et al
as 3:2019cv08313
Defendant:
Coconino, County of, Jess Payne, Keatan John Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyle v. City of Menlo Park et al
as 3:2019cv04215
Defendant:
Menlo Park Police Department, Chief of Police Bob Jensen, City of Menlo Park and others
Plaintiff:
John William Lyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Templeton v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02894
Plaintiff:
John William Templeton
Defendant:
Thriftbooks LLC, Google LLC and Amazon.com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Michael Channel, Sr. v. Benjamin Marquez, et al
as 19-15983
Defendant:
JOHN COLLINS, LAWRENCE F. WINTHROP, MICHAEL BAKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALLEN CHANNEL, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID MONTOYA, PPD Sergean, #6812, BENJAMIN MARQUEZ, Phoenix Police Department (PPD) Officer, #5429, RICHARD FURMAN, PPD Detective, #868 and others
Carlos Williams v. Donald Holbrook
as 19-70210
Respondent:
DONALD HOLBROOK, Washington State Penitentiary Superintendent
Petitioner:
CARLOS JOHN WILLIAMS
Williams v. Holbrook
as 2:2018cv01807
Respondent:
Donald R Holbrook
Petitioner:
Carlos John Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
