Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Gustin et al v. Kleen Concepts LLC
as 2:2022cv00525
Petitioner:
Michael H Gustin, Cindy B Gustin, John William Rhea and others
Respondent:
Kleen Concepts LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Sullivan v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2021cv01513
Plaintiff:
John William Sullivan
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Humana Multi Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Blankenship v. Coconino, County of et al
as 3:2019cv08313
Defendant:
Coconino, County of, Jess Payne, Keatan John Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01529
Plaintiff:
John William Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deachman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv00393
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John William Deachman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barnes v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv00697
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Don Stapley, Andrew Kunasek and others
Plaintiff:
John Williams Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seitz v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv00087
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
John William Seitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Capes v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00507
Petitioner:
John William Capes
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
