Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Smith v. Smith et al
as 7:2020cv00232
Defendant: Jane Doe, D. Dameron, John Doe and others
Plaintiff: Christopher C. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Augusta C.C. Personal Property Staff Sgt. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00119
Plaintiff: Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant: John Woodson and Augusta C.C. Personal Property Staff Sgt.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Amonette et al
as 7:2018cv00432
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Mr. Amonette, Mr. Kcaznski and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODSON v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv11848
Defendant: TAKEDA CALIFORNIA, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: JOHN WOODSON
In Re: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Paul Desper v. John Woodson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-7716
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES PAUL DESPER, a/k/a Jamie Paul Desper
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN WOODSON, Warden
Morris v. Woodson
as 1:2015cv01053
Petitioner: Larry James Morris
Respondent: John Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-6913
Plaintiff - Appellant: JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH
Defendant - Appellee: MR. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, MR. A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, WILLIAM BUCK ROGERS, Deputy Director and others
Strickland v. Beale et al
as 2:2014cv00435
Plaintiff: Harold E. Strickland
Defendant: James Beale, Major Sawyer, In-house Hearing Officer (IHO) Haden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Couch v. John Woodson
as 13-7975
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM R. COUCH
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN WOODSON, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center
Waller v. Woodson
as 2:2013cv00686
Petitioner: Dion Darnell Waller
Respondent: John Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?