Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Yarbrough v. Scoular Company, The
as 6:2021cv01109
Plaintiff:
John Yarbrough
Defendant:
Scoular Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arceneaux et al v. Fitness Connection Option Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv03418
Plaintiff:
Wesley Arceneaux , Samuel Barnhardt , Adam Bellinger and others
Defendant:
Fitness Connection Option Holdings, LLC, Titan Fitness, LLC, Titan Fitness Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams Hicks, et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 16-15370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAMS MICHAEL HICKS, KENNETH HARMS, as Class Representative Plaintiffs and Individual Plaintiffs, MATTHEW ACHATZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PGA TOUR, INC.
Yarbrough v. Unnamed Christian County Jail Staff
as 5:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
John Yarbrough
Defendant:
Unnamed Christian County Jail Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbrough v. United States
as 5:2015cv00124
Petitioner:
John Yarbrough
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. John Yarbrough
as 15-60282
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN VERNON YARBROUGH, also known as John Yarbrough
Hicks et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
William Michael Hicks , Kenneth Harms , Matthew Achatz and others
Defendant:
PGA Tour, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yarbrough et al v. Resorts Plus International, LLC
as 0:2012cv61033
Plaintiff:
John Yarbrough and Ronette L. Yarbrough
Defendant:
Resorts Plus International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
