Cases 21 - 30 of 419
MITCHELL v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
KERRY S MITCHELL
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMMS, LIEUTENANT ROSEVELT GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REH FAC ET
as 5:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REH FAC ET and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REH FAC et al
as 5:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REH FAC and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v.JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
as 5:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
LANORRIS MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
EDWARDS v. WILSON et al
as 5:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant:
WILSON, BERRY, CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. U.S. ATTY OFF et al
as 5:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
SAMMY LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
U.S. ATTY OFF, CSH DR. ZSAFR, NURSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GREEN et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
MILTON KENT JOHNSON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GREEN, LIEUTENANT CALLWELL, LIEUTENANT HOLIMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOGAN v. DOES
as 5:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AHMED v. GARLAND et al
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
YEHIA AHMED REDA M AHMED
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
