Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Sawyer v. Stolle et al
as 2:2011cv00446
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Sawyer
Defendant:
Kenneth Stolle , Conmed, Inc., Howard Haft, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAGERS v. MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC., et al
as 1:2010cv00126
Defendant:
MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC. , BOTANICAL LABORATORIES, INC. , ZICAM, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
ROSANNE KIRSTEN MAGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris et al v. KBR, Inc et al
as 8:2009cv03308
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Harris, Anthony Jerome Williams, Kathy Vines and others
Defendant:
KBR, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bunn v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority et al
as 1:2009cv01334
Plaintiff:
Edward Bunn
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and John and Jane Does Nos. 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Assault, Libel, Slander
Allison Williams v. VIDBIDNESS, INCORPORATED
as 09-1412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLISON WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
VIDBIDNESS, INCORPORATED, a Corporation, ERIC RIDLEY, an Individual, PAMELA MCLAUGHLIN, an Individual and others
Defendant - None:
ADVERTISING SEX, LLC, a Limited Liability Company, RAYMOND WILLIAMS, an Individual, PALMBEACH-ONLINE.COM, INCORPORATED, a Corporation and others
Jane Doe v. South Carolina Department of S
as 08-2161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE, by and through her guardians Gregory and Michelle Johnson, GREGORY JOHNSON, MICHELLE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, SCDSS, DEBBY THOMPSON, ELIZABETH G. PATTERSON, Director and others
Defendant - None:
KAMERSON SETH COX, TITSA M. FLESCH, HEALTHY MINDS, LLC and others
Jennings v. Hart et al
as 3:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
Heather Jennings
Defendant:
H. Lee Hart, Dan Ghent, Kristine Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
